First of all it never works on me. I come to easily. I tend more and more to sort out dominants who uses this a s a dominating technique.
I also think it's a counter-productive technique if the dominant's desire is to grow and nurture the sense and depth of submission in me.
It calls mostly for a gigantic mobilization of will-power for me to postpone an orgasm that wants to happen.
It becomes a tool to train will-power in me!
Where is the sense in that?
For me it is much more a re-inforcement of my objectification, my submissiveness, to constantly being brought to orgasm through the will and manipulation of my dominant. The orgasm just becomes a result of my dominant's action and is divorced from my own control. To hold it back re-inforces MY control, because it is ultimately I who have to control it.
I would like to hear from Dominants about this. What pleasure do you get out of it? Why do you think it is a productive technique?
Please, tell me!
Abonner på:
Legg inn kommentarer (Atom)
I very very rarely have an orgasm postponed, delayed or stopped as my owner finds far more joy in forcing out multitudes of them. We would both agree with your comment that by being forced to hold back gives the sub control.
SvarSlettThe pleasure he gets out of this - obviously the control aspect, but also because he loves to watch me orgasm. That's his pleasure and he's gonna take it lol!
honestly, as a fetish, I barely have it, it's something I picked up from watching BDSM porn... I tried it once, and the girl in question liked it way more than I did
SvarSlettas a purely selfish thing, I'd prefer to get my dominance kick out of having her obey comamnds that give me pleasure (e.g. being in shackles, giving me a blowjob) rather than deny her pleasure
sometimes her pleasure can be incidental to mine, esp. in fantasy scenarios, but in real life, I feel pretty egalatarian and want to make sure both people are having fun, even in a dom/sub situation